Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carolyn Garcia's avatar

This is important . We live in a different world. Seth Ferranti is telling it like it really is.

Expand full comment
DC Reade's avatar

This is solid research, Seth. But it reads to me as if you wrote it some time ago--some of the information is a few years out of date. The prescription opioid epidemic has since been superseded by the counterfeit prescription opioid pill epidemic. The prescription opioid epidemic took off in the 1990s, and the pill mil market peaked around 2010 or so. Since around 2015, the Feds have tightened oversight over both physicians and pharmacies, and as a result diversion to the illicit retail market has dropped significantly.

From your Substack post: "To combat abuse, drug and law enforcement officials are relying on a patchwork of state laws. Only eight states restrict pain clinic ownership. While 42 states have prescription drug monitoring programs, they don't all track the same information. Only 10 states are actively sharing data with other states..."

All 49 states (and parts of Missouri) now have prescription monitoring, according to the information in these links:

https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/key-issues/prescription-drug-monitoring-programs-by-state.pdf

The number of states now actively sharing data with other states has risen from 10 to 47:

https://nabp.pharmacy/members/programs-services/industry-information-networks/pmp-interconnect/

(The two states not yet sharing data were Nebraska and California, as of the date of the NABP publication. I can attest that California is internally strict, however. California was adhering to the original DEA "triple-script" protocol in the 1990s, when other states had begun ignoring it. And it was practically impossible to fill and out-of-state prescription, back when doing so was routine in other states. "Liberal" reputation notwithstanding, California is a pretty strict state in some ways. The CDC maps and charts show that in the era when pill mills were rampant on other parts of the country, California had a very low rate of prescription opioid abuse. California is heavily impacted by a wave of street addiction nowadays, but it wasn't induced by lax regulation of prescriptions back in the decades when prescription opioid pills were flooding the street in other states.)

I remember a few years ago, when I first read about the national prescription monitoring program while reading an article in some medical brochure while waiting for a doctor's appointment (regular checkup) in a medical office. The article noted that the number of states sharing a central database with in the teens (don't recall the exact number, somewhere between 10-16.) I just about fell over- these are DEA Schedule II drugs! This should be the one part of drug control that the DEA and the Feds actually have a handle on! All 50 states should have been part of an interconnected database back in the 1990s!

Instead, the country had wholesale-retail Oxycontin networks like the one described by your interviewee, and by Sam Quinones in his book Dreamland. Lucrative diversion operations were even started up by kids, like this one https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/the-dukes-of-oxy-how-a-band-of-teen-wrestlers-built-a-smuggling-empire-226940/

Now that's over. pretty much. And wouldn't you know, the legitimately made pharmaceuticals- which at least had the advantage of offering regulated stable dosages of properly compounded substances- have been replaced by a massive counterfeiting industry, using bogus "M30" pills compounded with fentanyl. Twenty years of oversight so lax that it was practically absent, followed by locking the gate after the horse left the barn. So now people with authentic severe chronic pain conditions are being micromanaged and undermedicated by DEA-wary physicians, while most of the addict population that resulted from the open clearinghouse days of Oxy have long since migrated to the street market in fentanyl, including the massive market in fentanyl-laced counterfeits.

The other part of the story- the one upstream from your script doc interviewee- is the role played by the "legitimate" pharmacy industry (that still uses traveling salespeople! on commission!) I elevate any number of street dealers over those people. It's clear that they knew what they were doing (unlike many of the physicians they peddled their line to, who were sincerely misled.) The best books I've read on that subject are the 2023 book Pain Killer: An Empire of Deceit and the Origin of America's Opioid Epidemic, by Barry Meier, and American Cartel: Inside the Battle to Bring Down the Opioid Industry,

by Sari Horwitz and Scott Higham, from 2022.

But by far the most tragic book on the subject is Dopesick: Dealers, Doctors, and the Drug Company that Addicted America, by Beth Macy, from 2018. I've read dozens of books on various forms of dope and drug abuse over the past 55 years or so. You name it, I've probably read it. Dopesick is the one book that left me sleepless and staring at the ceiling after I finished it.

It was all so sad, and so unnecessary. Until very recently, not even the medical schools were paying any attention to addiction medicine and education about the hazards of opioids. Realistic drug abuse education would have helped a lot, back in the 1980s and 1990s. Instead, the authorities of the era made marijuana the centerpiece of their antidrug efforts.

Expand full comment

No posts